Content Marketing Debate: Which PR Tool Should You Use?

November 1, 2010

With So Many News Release Services Available, Which Do You Choose?

Over the past few weeks, I have been using news releases to help you understand how to amplify your content marketing strategy. First, I discussed why you should start sending news releases now, and second, I provided an update on my experiment using them. In this post, I wanted to share some information on logistics.

Since I started this experiment, I created and released three news releases using PitchEngine, a free social media release service, and four releases using PRWeb, a paid PR service.

PR Web’s strengths are clear – news subscribers, thorough distribution, online pickup. But I wouldn’t discredit PitchEngine since readers seem more engaged, given the traffic conversion rates (we all know that content marketing is about customer engagement!). Personally, I don’t see the harm in utilizing both services. Each tool has its positives and negatives. I balanced the two by using PitchEngine to send targeted pitches concerning our content development and using PRWeb to spread our news-worthy items (i.e. events, investments, etc.)

Which PR service do you use and why?

Content Marketing Director

<strong>Amanda Maksymiw</strong> worked at OpenView from 2008 until 2012, where she focused on developing marketing and PR strategies for both OpenView and its portfolio companies. Today she is the Content Marketing Director at <a href="https://www.fuze.com/">Fuze</a>.